Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Life history theory predicts that organisms allocate resources across physiological processes to maximize fitness. Under this framework, early life adversity (ELA)—which often limits energetic capital—could shape investment in growth and reproduction, as well as trade-offs between them, ultimately contributing to variation in evolutionary fitness. Using long-term demographic, behavioral, and physiological data for 2,100 females from a non-human primate population, we tested whether naturally-occurring ELA influences investment in the competing physiological demands of growth and reproduction. By analyzing ELA, growth, and reproduction in the same individuals, we also assessed whether adversity intensifies trade-offs between life history domains. We found that ELA influenced life history patterns, and was associated with modified growth, delayed reproductive maturity, and small adult body size. Different types of ELA sometimes had distinct reproductive outcomes—e.g., large group size was linked to faster reproductive rates, while low maternal rank predicted slower ones. Adversity also amplified trade-offs between growth and reproduction: small body size was a stronger predictor of delayed and reduced reproductive output in females exposed to ELA, compared to those not exposed. Finally, we examined how traits modified by ELA related to lifetime reproductive success. Across the population, starting reproduction earlier and maintaining a moderate reproductive rate conferred the greatest number of offspring surviving to reproductive maturity. These findings suggest that ELA impacts key life history traits as well as relationships between them, and can constrain individuals from adopting the most optimal reproductive strategy. Significance StatementEarly life adversity (ELA) can have lasting effects on evolutionary fitness (e.g., the number of surviving offspring an animal produces); however, the paths connecting ELA to fitness—for example by influencing growth, reproductive timing or rate, or trade-offs between these processes—remain unclear. Leveraging long-term behavioral, physiological, and demographic data from 2,100 female rhesus macaques, we found that ELA-exposed females exhibited growth and reproductive schedules associated with less-optimal lifetime fitness outcomes. Further, ELA intensified trade-offs between growth and reproduction, suggesting that affected individuals face steeper energetic constraints. Our findings highlight the long-lasting impacts of ELA on traits of evolutionary and biomedical importance in a non-human primate model with relevance to humans.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available September 12, 2026
-
Abstract ObjectiveReconstructing the social lives of extinct primates is possible only through an understanding of the interplay between morphology, sexual selection pressures, and social behavior in extant species. Somatic sexual dimorphism is an important variable in primate evolution, in part because of the clear relationship between the strength and mechanisms of sexual selection and the degree of dimorphism. Here, we examine body size dimorphism across ontogeny in male and female rhesus macaques to assess whether it is primarily achieved via bimaturism as predicted by a polygynandrous mating system, faster male growth indicating polygyny, or both. MethodsWe measured body mass in a cross‐sectional sample of 362 free‐ranging rhesus macaques from Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico to investigate size dimorphism: (1) across the lifespan; and (2) as an outcome of sex‐specific growth strategies, including: (a) age of maturation; (b) growth rate; and (c) total growth duration, using regression models fit to sex‐specific developmental curves. ResultsSignificant body size dimorphism was observed by prime reproductive age with males 1.51 times the size of females. Larger male size resulted from a later age of maturation (males: 6.8–7.8 years vs. females: 5.5–6.5 years; logistic model) and elevated growth velocity through the pre‐prime period (LOESS model). Though males grew to larger sizes overall, females maintained adult size for longer before senescence (quadratic model). DiscussionThe ontogeny of size dimorphism in rhesus macaques is achieved by bimaturism and a faster male growth rate. Our results provide new data for understanding the development and complexities of primate dimorphism.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
